It came to my attention that Amnesty International Norway (a bit contradictory name..) have a freedom of speech day, namely today. Several of the blogs that I frequently read have posted some thoughts on the topic – so I thought I would set of and both think and write some on the topic.
Freedom of speech is probably one of the foundational human rights that we have, at least in the western world. The internet as we know it is based on this – everyone can say whatever they want and reach out to everyone else. However that is somewhat misleading. Cencoring of the internet is sadly an increasing trend. Governments, ISPs and even small scale businesses cencor pages. Although most of us agree that some pages on the web should be taken away it is not that easy to decide who should take this decision – is it the majority, the elected government, the unelected government – or is it someone else.
The Pirate bay (spec)trial is raging in the news – everyone has an opinion, and everyone should be entitled to one – but are they? Are everyone entitled to externalize and publish their thoughts? Well, the plain answer is, sadly, no. Why? Well, fear is probably the most common reason, secondly greed. Fear that someone may get information that you hold secret. Secondly a desire to have at least what you have, or preferably even more of what you have.
A bit on the philosophical lane there – anyway. I support strongly the freedom of speech – but also the freedom to choose! If someone utter something I don not want to hear, then I would like to have the freedom of choosing not to hear them – however I would like to have the possibility.
End up in having the feeling that I haven’t covered anything in this post, but probably some of my thoughts on freedom of speech is captured here:)
Geomatikkblog
IFPI suing Telenor makes a great case on internet freedom of speach imho. Why the **** should organizations like IFPI get to decide what pages of the web I can access. But, on the other hand, why do we opose this, but agree that KRIPOS makes the ISPs block pages with child pornography.. What is the teoretical difference here..?
(to avoid confusion: I do not support child pornography, and I don’t think it belongs on the internet, or anywhere, but it is still censorship, isn’t it?)
I totally agree with the argumentation! Exactly what I was trying to indicate:)
I do however believe that there are more facets that need to be addressed in the freedom of speech argumentation, and the censorship of the internet – most of all an ethical discussion is probably needed. I do also believe in democracy, and its ability to make the collectively right choices (i.e. child pornography vs. illegal downloading abilities).
Its a very interesting topic – I should write more on it:)
And NTNU (NUTS) misses the whole point: http://www.underdusken.no/nyhet/2009/4/1494624/-+vi+betrakter+anklagen+som+sann
Pingback: 49 bloggere - 20.000 lesere - Folkeaksjon for ytringsfrihet på nett